Identifying aggregate supply and demand shocks in South Africa
Stellenbosch Working Paper Series No. WP11/2007Publication date: 2007
Author(s):
[protected email address] (Bureau of Economic Research, Stellenbosch University)
Federico Sturzenegger (Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University)
This paper uses a structural VAR methodology to identify aggregate demand and supply shocks to real output for the South African economy. Demand shocks, in turn, are separated into fiscal and monetary shocks. The model is estimated with quarterly data over two overlapping samples: 1960Q2-2006Q4 and 1983Q4-2006Q4. The identified (structural) shocks were used in a historical decomposition to split output into a measure of potential output (resulting from the evolution of supply shocks) and a measure of the business cycle (the gap between actual and potential output). This measure of potential output suggests a significant decline relative to trend in the years prior to the political transition of 1994 and a swift reversal thereafter. The paper presents evidence from three sources to support its identification of aggregate supply and demand shocks. These sources are the following: theory consistent impulse response functions; a close match between the implied measure of the business cycle and independent information about the South African business cycle; and a demonstration of the close match between the identified series of aggregate supply shocks and important historical events in the decades prior to and following 1994 that have been identified by economic historians as important shocks to the South African economy.
JEL Classification:C25; C41; E32
Keywords:South Africa, aggregate supply, aggregate demand, monetary policy, fiscal policy, potential output, long-run restrictions
Download: PDF (472 KB)Login
(for staff & registered students)
BER Weekly
8 Nov 2024Donald Trump convincingly won the US presidential election. It was not nearly as close as most pollsters and number crunchers had expected, with Trump even winning the popular vote. Flying under the radar of the US election was the effective collapse of the German coalition government, with a snap election possible in March. Meanwhile, on the monetary...
Read the full issue
BER Weekly
8 Nov 2024Donald Trump convincingly won the US presidential election. It was not nearly as close as most pollsters and number crunchers had expected, with Trump even winning the popular vote. Flying under the radar of the US election was the effective collapse of the German coalition government, with a snap election possible in March. Meanwhile, on the monetary...
Read the full issue